data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17648/1764823e27e73f154e5fd17da16f7ce5df3bf3d7" alt=""
the main book, by vanessa nicolson, is excellently illustrated and researched ... but she sticks to the facts and so she doesn't really ask the question i need to answer ...
how did maurice go from being that sweet baby to becoming a part-time or temporary pornographer of [post-war/cold-war/state-sponsored?] violence ?
and which holder of the purse-strings commissioned the work on behalf of associated electrical industries, and how far was it's confrontational subject matter discussed ?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42d00/42d00e289f9645dda88d0ee80b7e6918d43f12f4" alt=""
maybe vanessa nicolson's single paragraph about maurice lambert's war-time experience gives us a tenuous clue to his own attitude
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f2d4/1f2d40a74d181ea4b052800366ae9dab6e7f3627" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da6b9/da6b9a03522b6aaaf8f783800e665704c3cc17ae" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88e90/88e9056eff82b05ac07a1882b6f2ecb1220588d3" alt=""
... and maybe the following article, which popped up when i googled "corporate cold war art", might help to give some perspective to the nature of this commission ...
http://libcom.org/history/articles/cultural-cold-war/